| Resettlement failures lead European governments to back out of Ilisu Dam Project in Turkey |
|
|
|
|
The withdrawl of the 3 European countries from Ilisu is caused by Turkey's hydraulic authority failure to fulfill several crucial conditions for Involuntary Resetlement and for Cultural Heritage preservation, agreed with the Export Credit Agencies (ECA) of these countries. The cancellation responds to the vast protests of European and international NGOs against this dam. While an enormous number - 55,000 people- will be forcibly displaced, the compensation paid for their expropriated houses is, under Turkish law, depreciated bellow the cost of rebuilding a substitute house, resulting in impoverishment , indebtedness, and lower levels of living for PAPs. No specific lands for the relocation of as many as 150 villages and their farming and grazing land needs were found yet, let alone equipped with infrastructure. Therefore, Germany, Switzerland and Austria refused to agree with the start of construction of Ilisu dam under their credit and withdrew their earlier support. First report written February 8th 2008. The second report written on June 13th 2008.
Only registered users can write comments!
Powered by !JoomlaComment 3.26
3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved." |
||||||||||||
| Last Updated ( Tuesday, 28 July 2009 ) | ||||||||||||
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
| INDR identifies key human rights issues in the IFC involuntary resettlement policy revision |
|
On behalf of INDR, Theodore (Ted) Downing helped prepared an overview of human rights issues to be considered in the revision of the International Finance Corporation's Performance Standard on Involuntary Resettlement and Land Acquistion (PS5). INDR joined with the International Accountabiity Project (Jennifer Kalafut) and the Housing and Land Rights Network (Shivani Chaudhry) to prepare a brief on key Issues for Upholding Housing Land and Property Rights in the International Finance Corporation’s Review of Environmental and Social Policy Standards (Jan 2010). Their findings highlighted 1) minimizing displacement and ensuring that displaced persons are project beneficiaries, 2) inclusion of individuals and communities who lose their livelihoods because of polluted fisheries, diminished water supplies, air pollution and other project impacts who face the full gamut of potential human rights violations and risks associated with unmitigated displacement, 3) inclusion of full risk assessment and livelihood restoration measures, 4) ensurance that there are specific requirements for providing information and training about rights and processes options (including IFC policies and accountability mechanisms) by a third party prior to negotiations to help balance the bargaining power, and 5) strengthening of free, prior and informed consent in compliance with other international standards. |